Sunday, January 27, 2008

Trading Q & A

Hi. I have subscibed for a few months in the past and am looking at your monitored trades stats. I am interested in your service, but need to understand it better. I have gone through your blog a couple of times.

Questions:

1) I am interested in trading your buy and sell probe signals. There seems to be a delay from the date they are "justified" and the original date you say the position was taken. You allow 1-1/2 hours from signal to position taken. I am really confused how that happens.

My question is, when you give an IP or KP probe signal how do I know accurately and immediately that it has occured in order to trade that signal.

I'm looking for the red or green arrow as well as your commentary on the chart. Am I missing something else?

In order to know accurately that a “justified probe” has qualified for entry, one must first understand the basic concept of momentum divergence . In general, counter trend probes “justify” when momentum fails to confirm a fresh price extreme.

We have recently quantified how, where, and when to “pull-the-trigger” once this criteria is met. For the purposes of tracking signal performance, we have defined entry levels for counter trend probes at the opening price of the third (30-minute) price bar following the extreme against which the probe was justified.

In short, once a justified divergent extreme is observed, one would then closely monitor and confirm that the following two 30-minute price bars have traded in the desired direction, away from the extreme price print at the time of divergence.

Once confirmed, one would place their order “at the market” after an acceptable open of the third price bar following the observed print extreme. Obviously, one would not place an order if the third price bar gapped beyond the extreme from which the probe was justified. In such a case, the process would likely start all over again should the observed divergence persist.

Concurrently, one would then place a discretionary stop-loss order at least one tick beyond the extreme price print. Such an occurrence tells us to abandon the probe, and that the previously observed extreme, was NOT “the” absolute pivot extreme we were seeking.

Once elected, for performance tracking purposes, we determine profit exit-targets at the nearest available trade-trigger target - either existing, or established - after the counter-trend trade is on.

Obviously, exit targets are also discretionary, and one may wish to stay with a counter-trend probe position for a larger move – especially if the signal is of KP vs. IP in nature.

Should a specific probe fail - The moment price action moves against the trade and makes a new extreme (hitting our mechanical stop loss) we categorize that specific probe as a “loss” and record it as such – adding 15% to the loss for slippage/commission, and other associated transaction costs.

Bear in mind however, that quite often, shortly after one probe fails, another of the same order is in the making. When this occurs, we repeat the same process of observing divergence as described above, wait for the two bars following a perceived low to move in the desired direction, then place a market order concurrent with a new stop-loss order after the open of an acceptable third bar.

This type of rather common probe-failure speaks to your question relating to the time elapsed between the time in which a market begins to signal justification to “probe” - to the time in which it actually delivers a successful quantified entry and favorable outcome.

We have stated repeatedly that probes are rarely if ever one-shot deals. They require a steady and controlled campaign effort to capture favorable entry to a given absolute turn-pivot of merit.

There are also times, when such campaigns seemingly go on forever with a string of 4, or 5 losses prior to a pivotal counter-trend turn being captured.

Furthermore, it is critical to understand and monitor these dynamic conditions in real-time. The market may telegraph new information at any given point throughout the trading session.

As such, one must be cognizant of our pending justification for probes, relative to one’s current or pending positions in the market, and - if the current probe fails – how to correctly observe intraday divergence in order to prepare for the next probe justification and stated entry criteria.

It is not practical, for us to monitor and provide real-time notification via e-mail alerts as to each and every intraday probe-failure and reinstatement campaign.

Instead, on a daily basis - we alert traders as to when and where IP, or KP probes are justified, pending or elected, providing them with the heads-up to begin, hold, or continue campaigning for such moves if they are so inclined.

Those trading short-term triggers or IP probes, must watch the markets they trade ALL-THROUGHOUT the trading session.

As an aside, similar to probes failing and re-instating amid any given intraday session, smaller trade-trigger boundaries may also develop intraday.

After a week or more of observing where, why, and how we draw our trajectory lines, most if not all short-term traders should be able to spot these trigger-lines as they develop in real-time.

In most cases, though smaller trade-trigger trajectories may develop during the session, it is not too often that they elect in the same day.

Swing-Traders with a tad-longer time horizon must either allow more generous discretion in using wider stops (more-risk), or like the short-term trader, watch the markets ALL-THROUGHOUT the session for optimal entries, failures, and re-entry signals.


2) You mentioned you were working on parameters for trading short term and swing trading. As the expert, I would value your information greatly and maybe that would simplify things. I would love a manual or guide.

This is but one amongst a plethora of plans and projects we intend to eventually provide in order to enhance our subscriber services.

In the interim, we have recently expanded each of our reports to include informative introductory pages.

This, along with the Q&A information provided on the blog page – contain much of the information one may require relative to general trading strategies – albeit in a loosely organized and fragmented fashion.


3) The trading results you are compiling each week, are these all IP and KP probe signals? Or a combination of trendline break, etc. signals?

The performance monitor (trading results) is designed to track (without discretion) points lost or captured for ALL COLLECTIVE (combination) sell-side, buy-side, and counter-trend campaigns.

The results presented are based on each trade’s individual merit and ultimate outcome. We monitor each position through completion, and without regard for single-account offset implications.

The impartiality and volume of signals identified, provides traders with an abundance of non-biased discretionary trade selections from which to choose and monitor. Each trade or signal is tracked through fruition using proprietary (non-discretionary) mechanical stops and exit targets.

Obviously, at their individual discretion, traders are free to choose modified entry-points, exit-targets, and stop-management criteria to suit their various trading/account preferences, and tolerance for risk.

As such, depending on trade selection, single or multiple account strategies, along with discretionary stop and position management, one’s actual performance may be far-better, or far-worse than the cumulative (non-discretionary) performance statistics recorded.


Thank you for taking the time to answer my questions.

We hope that our above response has adequately addressed your questions.
Read More ->>

Wednesday, January 23, 2008

The Song Remains the Same

Hauntingly Familiar
Here we are once again, suddenly embroiled amid a frenzy of financial crisis, and looming bail-out interventions.

The jury is still out as to whether or not this crisis will turn out to be “the big one” that will take down the entire house of cards.

Inevitably, the day will come when no form of economic stimulus or monetary policy interventions will be sufficient enough to provide remedy to the decades of sub-standard stewardship rendered by our elected officials.

Until such a day of reckoning arrives, we can not discount the possibility that the present cast of self-perceived masters-of-the-universe and their monopoly stronghold, which is rapidly fracturing, will prevail once again.

Following this week’s short-term trading summary, we will provide a brief, big-picture overview of the broad market indices to see just how vulnerable they have become in the last three months.

Maintaining Resolve
Another such song that remains the same is the one we sing daily while interpreting the price-action landscape from a short-term trader’s perspective.

Our analysis is purely a function of price-action, which in turn is continually reconciled against our longer-term wave counts and view of overall market structures.

Our proprietary work graphically deciphers the dynamic price-action landscape as it unfolds. We carefully draft the analysis to be free of bias, highlighting most, if not all of the pending and active trade-triggers telegraphed within a given price series.

Short-Term Trading Summary: Week ending 18-Jan.
From a counter-trend rally standpoint – though we continue to anticipate and prepare for one, as of last week - no low was low enough from which to launch a sustainable counter-trend rally.

Coming into last week on the short-side with two successive sell-triggers, a pair of intervening stabs at a tradable low failed miserably.

Shortly thereafter, we were back on the right side of things with another sell-trigger elected on Wednesday.

Thursday provided additional justification to probe for a low. Following a modest rally attempt at the open on Friday, this effort also ended up failing.

Friday’s failed rally-attempt allowed us a rare second chance to enter a previously triggered short-trade (circled) which we failed to identify in our prior days report.

All said and done, we took over 580 points from the Dow by week’s end.

Below is graphic summary of this week’s trade-triggers identified via Elliott Wave Technology’s Near Term Outlook . 


 
THE BROAD MARKET UPDATE (BIG-PICTURE)
On a grand-scale, major equity indices have breached key-minor support levels in recent weeks. They are fast approaching a time frame in which a swift and forceful recovery must get underway in order to re-claim and salvage their fractured minor-degree up-trends.

Failure to do so in a timely fashion, accompanied by an acceleration of losses, risks engendering widespread recognition that a longer-term “trend change” to the downside has embedded itself in the minds of the majority of participants both large and small. 

 

The Near Term Outlook covers the short-term Dow, S&P, and NDX five-days-per-week, and issues near-term updates for the Dollar, Gold, Crude Oil, and the HUI two times per week.
Read More ->>

Wednesday, January 16, 2008

Tuesday, January 1, 2008

Interpreting EWT's Charts, Commentary, and Annotations

Hello there,

I've just subscribed to the NTO as I'm relatively new to trading and find EWT very interesting - I understand basic wave counts and Fibonnaci retracements, but do you have any links to explain the more complex aspects, as it's quite confusing from looking at your charts how and why the lines have been drawn where they have as I'm not familiar with some of the annotation (R1, S2 etc), and the technical commentary appears aimed at a more advanced level which is understandable.

Any help you can provide would be appreciated as I would like to be a long term subscriber to your reports, and obviously I need to improve my knowledge in this area.

Regards

Elliott Wave Technology's Reply:

Welcome aboard!

Firstly, do not be intimidated by all of the trendlines, and technical commentary present throughout our reports. Once understood, you will come to find it is a rather simplistic road-map, citing the most likely future outcome probabilities that the price action is currently telegraphing.

In short, the trendlines, or extended “trajectories” as we like to call them, often mark trade triggers with an associated point-value as price crosses above or beneath such boundaries. We label such trajectories as (R) resistance, and (S) support. We mark each trajectory with an up or down arrow, along with a point-value and active or marginalized price objective that is directly associated with it. There is often more than one set of trajectories, which is why we use R-1, R-2, R-3 etc. All are relevant until they reach target, become permanently or temporarily marginalized, or technically negate for one reason or another.

Quite often, the trajectories and associated targets relative to sell-trigger/support-failures, or buy-trigger/resistance-breakouts will become “marginalized” threatening failure. When this happens, the up/down arrows and price-objectives are muted in color to highlight their “marginalization” status. Should price reclaim the trajectory, we return the active color status in a bold primary color.

Bear in mind, the above has nothing directly to do with Elliott Wave, however it is a proprietary and rather complimentary method of analysis in which we measure and project the short and near-term intent of the price action. This method, in concert with our preferred/anticipated wave-counts, provides for a high level of success in identifying short-term price objectives.

Such trade-triggers are at times, one-way-tickets to immediate short-term profit – free of drawdown. At other times, drawdown’s will often occur in advance of such triggers reaching target. At yet other times, targets may fail outright as other opposing elected triggers take over. Monitoring the status of all such trajectories keeps traders apprised of potential impact relative to their specific trades, profit targets, tolerance for risk, and general money management criteria.

In each possible case – the boundaries and trajectory markers are set. Such boundaries are extrapolated in order to provide a meaningful gauge for traders to best manage profit/loss, take-profit, abort, reverse or re-establish a given position.

A third and separate level of methodology incorporated is that of buy and sell “probes.” These are “counter-trend” in nature, and attempt to catch early tops and bottoms at various degrees of trend. Please refer to some of the trading questions in the balance of the blog page for a more complete discussion on buy and sell probes.

Do take the time to carefully read all of the chart-note-definitions included with each issue of the NTO. In addition, read and absorb the general trading notes highlighted (in blue text) in the “Evening Post” archives to gain added insights.

We have provided two links from our blog page above. Here again, take the time to invest in carefully reading through the posted “trading questions” and all other informative materials relative to getting the most benefit from our publications.

Once you’ve read, then re-read and assimilated all of the basic chart-note definitions – then for a second or third time, review all of the content from the blog page – the simplicity of it all will come together rather quickly. It will then become crystal clear as to what we are speaking of when you read the straight-to-the-point technical commentaries associated with each price chart we present.

Do let us know if this helped answer your questions, and do feel free to inquire with specificity, as to any other facet of our analysis and forecasting models.
Read More ->>